Images and video recordings of the Court’s Justices on the Court’s website or otherwise may not be used to advance private interests or in furtherance of any commercial purpose (see Advisory Committee on Judicial Ethics Op. 20-158; see generally 22 NYCRR 100.2 [C], 100.4 [D] [3]).

1099
TP 20-00735

STANNY VARGAS
    V
T. MCCARTHY

CPLR art 78 Proceeding Transferred by Order of

OVER THE TERM

1100
TP 20-00878

KEION PIERRE
    V
ANTHONY J. ANNUCCI

CPLR art 78 Proceeding Transferred by Order of

OVER THE TERM

1101
TP 20-00879

KEION PIERRE
    V
STEWART ECKERT

CPLR art 78 Proceeding Transferred by Order of

OVER THE TERM

1102
KA 19-00379

PEOPLE
    V
JAIME CORDON

Burglary

     ERIN A. KULESUS SUB
     MICHAEL J. HILLERY SUB

1103
KA 16-02342

PEOPLE
    V
JOSUE F.

Criminal Possession Weapon

     DREW R. DUBRIN SUB
     NANCY GILLIGAN SUB

1104
KA 16-02343

PEOPLE
    V
JOSUE F.

Criminal Possession Weapon

TO BE ARGUED WITH #1103

1105
KA 18-00561

PEOPLE
    V
JORDAN T. SMITH

Sentence

  CARA A. WALDMAN 10
     V. CHRISTOPHER EAGGLESTON SUB

1106
KA 18-01872

PEOPLE
    V
DAVID RATH

Predatory Sexual Assault Against a Child

  KRISTIN M. PREVE 10
  DANIEL J. PUNCH 10

1107
KA 16-02355

PEOPLE
    V
CALVIN L. BUTLER

Criminal Possession Controlled Substance

  CARA A. WALDMAN 15
     V. CHRISTOPHER EAGGLESTON SUB

1108
KA 05-02775

PEOPLE
    V
JAMES L. JONES

Murder

  DONALD M. THOMPSON 10
  SCOTT MYLES 10

1109
KA 19-00447

PEOPLE
    V
ISREAL HERNANDEZ

Burglary

  SHERRY A. CHASE 10
  DANIEL J. PUNCH 10

1110
KA 17-00739

PEOPLE
    V
LUTHER BROWN

Criminal Possession Forged Instrument

     KATHLEEN P. REARDON SUB
  DEREK HARNSBERGER SUB

1111
KA 16-00132

PEOPLE
    V
MARVIN A. DILLARD

Arson

  BRIDGET L. FIELD 10
  KAYLAN C. PORTER 5

1112
KA 17-01704

PEOPLE
    V
CALVIN L. BUTLER, JR.

Criminal Possession Controlled Substance

  CARA A. WALDMAN 5
  MARK S. SINKIEWICZ 5

1113
KA 17-01705

PEOPLE
    V
CALVIN L. BUTLER, JR.

Criminal Sale Controlled Substance

TO BE ARGUED WITH #1112

1114
OP 20-00776

MONTGOMERY BLAIR SIBLEY
    V
STEUBEN COUNTY PISTOL PERMIT CLERK

Original Proceeding

OVER THE TERM

1115
CA 20-00128

DAVID P. RICE, SR.
    V
NEW YORK STATE WORKERS' COMPENSATION BOARD

Summary Judgment

  OWEN DEMUTH 10
  CRAIG R. BUCKI 10

1116
CA 19-01771

ANDREW SOLECKI
    V
OAKWOOD CEMETERY ASSOCIATION

Jury Trial

  CORY J. WEBER 15
  WILLIAM A. QUINLAN 15

1117
CA 19-01794

ANDREW SOLECKI
    V
OAKWOOD CEMETERY ASSOCIATION

Jury Trial

TO BE ARGUED WITH #1116

1118
CA 19-00202

BONITA POWERS
    V
CANANDAIGUA MEDICAL GROUP, P.C.

Summary Judgment

  DANIEL J. ALTIERI 10
  ERIC M. DOLAN 10

1119
CA 20-00680

KRYSTALO HETELEKIDES
    V
COUNTY OF ONTARIO

RPTL

  JASON S. DIPONZIO 15
  MARY JO S. KORONA 15

1120
CA 19-02024

L&M GROUP, LIMITED
    V
AMY LIPSITZ

Summary Judgment

  VINCENT MIRANDA 15
  AMANDA L. LOWE 15

1121
CA 19-02055

BENEVOLENT AND PROTECTIVE ORDER OF ELKS
    V
CREATIVE COMFORT SYSTEMS, INC.

Contract

  MARCO CERCONE 5
  THOMAS S. LANE 15

1122
CA 19-01356

BENEVOLENT AND PROTECTIVE ORDER OF ELKS
    V
CREATIVE COMFORT SYSTEMS, INC.

Set Aside Verdict

TO BE ARGUED WITH #1121

1122.1
CA 20-00401

MAGIC CIRCLE FILMS INTERNATIONAL LLC
    V
MARY ELLEN BREON

Summary Judgment

  BRIAN CALANDRA 15
  JOSEPH A. CAMARDO, JR. 15

1122.2
CA 19-01253

CHRISTOPHER FISCHER
    V
JOSEPH GARGANO, SENIOR

Summary Judgment

OVER THE TERM

ACCESSIBILITY

If you are unable to access the archive of a particular argument because of a disability, please contact Alan Ross, Deputy Clerk of the Court and the Court’s designated ADA Liaison (by e-mail at aross@nycourts.gov or by telephone at 585-530-3102), to request a reasonable accommodation.

Hearing Assistance

ASSISTED LISTENING devices are available in each courtroom during arguments. Please see a court attendant when you enter the courtroom.

CLOSED CAPTIONING is available while viewing archived (not live) oral arguments. Hover your mouse over the video and click the [cc] icon to activate the captions. Please note: these captions are generated by a computer algorithm and are not considered a transcript of the proceedings.

Periodically the court may suspend a broadcast to protect the privacy interests of individuals in matters before the Court.

  Comment  Share your thoughts, comments or suggestions as part of the Court's Excellence Initiative.